Theories of Atlantis

75 Comments »

1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0FiCxZKuv8&feature=related

   Comment by Theorizer # January 14, 2009 at 5:42 pm

2. This is a really good video to watch about it, but its 2 hours long. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8419499993878733310

   Comment by Ray # January 14, 2009 at 8:02 pm

3. MLK’s last speech is disturbingly prophetic, isn’t it. Thanks for the post. Old news, but good news. Just to let your viewers know, William Pepper(no, not the ex-Element pro) is still active in the “truth movement” and is currently involved in the NYC 9/11 Ballot Initiative, http://www.nyc911initiative.org/ which was working very hard to get a petition signed for a new investigation into 9/11. Word up.

   Comment by Towelizer # January 14, 2009 at 8:07 pm

4. Any of you fellas familiar with this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloop maybe are UFO’s aren’t from outer space after all, and we do know more about the moon than out own oceans. Shits way off topic, but i had to see you guy’s feedback

   Comment by EastCoastOligy # January 14, 2009 at 9:23 pm

5. Do me a favor and when you read that switch the “out” with “our” because i suck.

   Comment by EastCoastOligy # January 14, 2009 at 9:25 pm

6. Um….no offense, EastcoastOligy, but “The Bloop” shouldn’t be discussed in the same post as the MLK assassination. It’s the same thing as when I used to go to the book store to find a book about the JFK assassination and discover that it was filed away under “New Age” or “Paranormal”. The idea of linking such things together damages the credibility of important subjects like MLK, RFK and JFK’s assassinations in people’s minds and therefore they dismiss ever really investigating the mountain of evidence that proves what we have been told happened is an outrageous lie.

   Comment by Theorizer # January 14, 2009 at 10:07 pm

7. In Towelizer’s Book Club, we’re gonna take a look at the New York Times bestselling author and neo-conservative pundit, Tony Blankley’s new book, American Grit. In it he outlines how we can make America’s power “last forever” and how to achieve a “new nationalism”. He prescribes a three-pronged approach, and lays out a compelling plan for the U.S. to implement (from Amazon):
   * A universal military draft of both men and women–not only to boost the size of our fighting force, but to instill a unity of toughness and cultural purpose among both the personally self-indulgent and un-assimilated immigrants. (A draft.)
   * A policy to get us on the road to energy independence to expand our diplomatic and economic options in the Middle East and around the world. (note the use of the word “independence”.)
   * A serious and sophisticated program for communicating Western moral values and the American spirit of self-determination to people living under oppressive regimes as well as to voters here at home.(”Western moral values.” I love it!)
   Listen to Tony interviewed on everyone’s favorite amplifying device, Fox News, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esRjcwyjUUU
   Anyhow, onto Towelizer’s magazine club. Anyone see Obama’s new Newsweek cover? Does anyone else see an owl? http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/0cCydxHcLC5ch/340x.jpg
   Enjoy!

   Comment by Towelizer # January 15, 2009 at 7:36 am

8. The 13th Amendment: “Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime where of the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.” Is conscription not involuntary servitude?

   Comment by A Federal Farmer # January 15, 2009 at 7:42 am

9. How Israel Manufactured the Gaza Escalation, http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/5776

   Comment by Bruticus # January 15, 2009 at 7:50 am

10. Hey Tearorizer, thought you’d enjoy this, http://blogs.kansascity.com/tvbarn/2009/01/rescue-me-chara.html
    and then this, http://www.infowars.com/?p=7158

    Comment by Towelizer # January 15, 2009 at 8:02 am

11. Talking about the Constitution now akin to committing “acts of terror and espionage”, http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2008/051208_feds_accuse.htm

    Comment by FED PHARMICUETICALS # January 15, 2009 at 8:09 am

12. I also wanted to post this Digg comment on the article I just posted that I thought was interesting. It reminds us of the true nature and aim of the Constitution:
    “There is a mention in the article which is a mistake. The Bill of Rights IS NOT a list of rights that we have. The Bill of Rights provide NO RIGHTS to anyone. The Bill of Rights PROTECT the People’s pre-existing rights. The Bill of Rights tell the Feds that they cannot make any law or infringe on these certain rights. And any rights which are not listed are retained by the people. This is because we DO NOT derive any rights from government. The Constitution is where we tell the government what their limited role is. WE ALREADY HAVE ALL NATURAL RIGHTS.”

    Comment by FED PHARMICUETICALS # January 15, 2009 at 8:15 am

13. “are you single”

    Comment by PennyPacker # January 15, 2009 at 9:48 am

14. Regarding involuntary servitude, “The Supreme Court has held, in Butler v. Perry, 240 U.S. 328 (1916), that the Thirteenth Amendment does not prohibit “enforcement of those duties which individuals owe to the state, such as services in the army, militia, on the jury, etc.”

    Comment by Farmer's Son # January 15, 2009 at 6:17 pm

15. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZLvSnr6s50&feature=related

    Comment by RayRay # January 15, 2009 at 8:51 pm

16. youcantlitterwithabanana.blogspot.com

    Comment by chiquita # January 16, 2009 at 8:15 am

17. So ship off to “war” then slave. Obviously we are taking our marching orders from two completely different sources. I love the language in that “ruling”. “Army”(which should be voluntary), “Militia”(which should be the civilian voluntary “army”) and “jury”(HA! Ok, I can understand “serving the state” in that instance). The obvious problem with this so-called “ruling” is(and let this serve as a reminder), we are “the state”, he who is so quick to take his marching orders. You my friend sound like a sheepish slave. Maybe “Farmer’s slave” is a more appropriate moniker for you now. And whoever is shamelessly putting this wack banana blog bullshit up needs to chill. That shit is wack corny and advertising like your doing is even worse. Have some dignity and respect for yourself and the other readers. My god, go advertise your high school antics somewhere else, like in the skatepark bathroom. Good fucking lord.

    Comment by FED PHARMICUETICALS # January 16, 2009 at 10:54 am

18. you’re.

    Comment by FED PHARMICUETICALS # January 16, 2009 at 10:55 am

19. What the fuck is wrong with people?

    Comment by FED PHARMICUETICALS # January 16, 2009 at 10:55 am

20. awwww

    Comment by chiquita # January 16, 2009 at 11:20 am

21. wack-quita.

    Comment by FED PHARMICUETICALS # January 16, 2009 at 12:35 pm

22. “banana”

    Comment by FED PHARMICUETICALS # January 16, 2009 at 12:36 pm

23. “bo-nana”

    Comment by BO PHARMICUETICALS # January 16, 2009 at 12:37 pm

24. Has anyone noticed the similarity in the late Comedian Bill Hicks:

    http://justgetthere.us/blog/uploads/billhicks.jpg

    and Towel’s favorite source Alex Jones:

    http://opposingdigits.com/images/alexjones.jpg

    It’s uncanny!

    Comment by Bob Sackamano # January 16, 2009 at 12:43 pm

25. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5n6chxpEINs

    Comment by Theorizer # January 16, 2009 at 1:03 pm

26. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cNknWT-agT0

    Comment by Bob Sackamano # January 16, 2009 at 1:05 pm

27. ‘For your information, the Supreme Court has ROUNDLY REJECTED PRIOR RESTRAINT…’
    -Walter Sobchak

    Comment by Seabreeze # January 16, 2009 at 3:38 pm

28. CHESLEY P. SULLEY SULLENBERGER

    Comment by ripcord # January 16, 2009 at 9:36 pm

29. “…masonic Jews tormented, tortured, mutilated, and murdered over 100 million Christians and other innocents in the 20th century’s most bloody holocausts without so much as a whimper from the world’s politicians and media… These Jewish-directed genocidal events…far exceeded the terror of the Nazi holocaust… We’ve heard over and over what the Nazis did. Why is it we never hear about the horrors perpetrated by the communists?”
    -Texe Marrs, via this page:
    http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://faith.propadeutic.com/authors/MarrsTexe.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.myspace.com/calciumboy&usg=__Y8L_RydYisBYlG7G-DB44Rtyomk=&h=125&w=100&sz=17&hl=en&start=16&sig2=-kGKr–tE7VhenjJY2UB-Q&um=1&tbnid=4EGxsQHjSmkbeM:&tbnh=90&tbnw=72&ei=YZtxSd_wIsibtweByaXRCA&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dtexe%2Bmarrs%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rlz%3D1G1GGLQ_ENUS259%26sa%3DN

    Comment by Seabreeze # January 17, 2009 at 1:51 am

30. I didn’t realize Dowd was in The Big Lebowski, http://image.guim.co.uk/Guardian/arts/gallery/2007/jul/22/comedy.films/big_lebowski_kobal-3262.jpg

    Comment by FED PHARM # January 17, 2009 at 9:14 am

31. Anyone recognize anything strange with that flight?

    Comment by FED PHARM # January 17, 2009 at 9:16 am

32. http://la.curbed.com/uploads/2008_03_guyton_billboard.JPG

    Comment by Bo-nana-drama # January 17, 2009 at 9:18 am

33. og bo

    Comment by bo # January 17, 2009 at 2:48 pm

34. mass bo

    Comment by bo # January 17, 2009 at 2:48 pm

35. bo wt

    Comment by bo # January 17, 2009 at 2:49 pm

36. youcantlitterashanti

    Comment by bo # January 17, 2009 at 2:50 pm

37. “An Act of Bo” by Willie BoBo

    Comment by Bowel # January 17, 2009 at 4:05 pm

38. It appears that some jocks are posting under the identity of the “Fed Farmer” and the “Bo” guy. Which is really whack. Stop that shit, you fucking goons and go back to blogging on NFL.com.

    Comment by Fear Riser # January 17, 2009 at 5:46 pm

39. “Fear Riser”, I can assure you that the only other person using the word “bo” or posting with the word “bo” in the moniker or in comment is totally licensed and authorized to do so. In fact you should try it. Go ahead: “Bo Riser”. See, you can do it. You see the word “bo” is simply a descriptive noun, al beit used usually by one, in particular commenter on this site. Anyone can use it though to describe something that is wack, corny, cornballs, ridiculous or, well, “bo”. For an even more intensive description of how insanely wack something is, you can use the adjunct, “bo-bo”. Such as “You can’t litter with a banana is a bo-bo name for a website.” Or “Willy Bobo was my favorite musician.” Try it: “My name is Fear Riser and not only is my choice of a name to address this issue that I am severely mistaken about “bo”, but the way I have addressed and described this so-called “really whack” situation, is absolutely and ridiculously “bo-bo”. In turn, I am ultra “bo”.” See anyone can do it, even the bo-ist of the bo. Again, I whole heartedly assure you that the only one using the bo noun on this site besides the “bo guy” thus far is the Fed Farmer. If you had keen or sharp sensibilities you would have identified immediately the differences between the two styles of comment and usage or at least had a suspicion which it seems you did. Now if anyone uses the moniker “Ashanti” then we have an obvious name rapist and should be rightfully and dutifully frowned upon. As you can see, I have thoughtfully and quite obviously, graced my usual moniker as the “Towel” as the “Bowel”, obviously siting the rhyming nature of the two names, but also making use of the duplicitous nature of the proper name for an asshole’s corridor. It saddens me when I have to travel this route, but alas, sometimes it is necessary. No pun intended. But again, I assure you, the only one posting under a non-assumed name is the Fed Farmer, who is completely licensed, trained and permitted with use of the term. I also assure you no one will be posting under Fed Farmer anytime soon as they will be exposed almost immediately and charged with the most heinous of crimes, identity rape. But watch how many half wits attempt it. Also watch how many people start using the word “bo” as it has finally garnered the attention it rightfully deserves.
    Anyhow, onto other and more important news. I highly suggest everyone in Tearies/Bo-Bo Land listen to this interview with Webster Tarpley where he systematically breaks it down about Oboma, the economy and just exactly where we’re going. He also mention Shepard Fairey for all you art fags out there. http://www.thealexjonesshow.com/articles/2009/january/011609-tarpley.html Seabreeze, you’ll love this and Son of Dogshit, you should take some notes as well. By the way, you guys aren’t the same doof, are you?

    Comment by Bowel # January 17, 2009 at 9:43 pm

40. Oh, Bo-Rizer, I assure you as well, all Fed Farm comments and any derivative or variation of Fed Farm are mine as well. Learn it. Live it. Love it.

    Comment by Bowel # January 17, 2009 at 9:45 pm

41. Bo it.

    Comment by FED PHARM # January 17, 2009 at 9:45 pm

42. fear riser- bo and the fed farmer will take that ass to trial with the quickness …. step down before you get put in a bo ass fed lock son

    Comment by o.g bo know # January 17, 2009 at 9:55 pm

43. http://i286.photobucket.com/albums/ll116/victorcadierno/headlock.gif

    Comment by o.g bo know # January 17, 2009 at 10:08 pm

44. JJC, via RVZ, says it all right here:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EsIqEq9OFxE&feature=related

    Comment by Seabreeze # January 18, 2009 at 1:11 am

45. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bobo_doll_experiment

    Comment by bo # January 18, 2009 at 8:13 am

46. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bobo_Chan

    Comment by bo # January 18, 2009 at 8:16 am

47. http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&rls=com.microsoft:*:IE-Address&rlz=1I7DKUS_en&q=bobo&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wl

    Comment by bo ville # January 18, 2009 at 8:18 am

48. http://boboli.gwbakeries.com/

    Comment by bo food # January 18, 2009 at 8:23 am

49. just remember, you can’t be bobby without being almost half bo.

    Comment by Buster Halterman # January 18, 2009 at 8:59 am

50. Bo-ster Halterman.

    Comment by FED PHARM # January 18, 2009 at 12:38 pm

51. trial ……….

    Comment by bo # January 18, 2009 at 12:44 pm

52. 32-40
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILXRs-lvEog&feature=related

    Comment by bo # January 18, 2009 at 2:45 pm

53. I just wanted to take a moment to address all of these Abraham Lincoln/Barack Obama comparisons being flaunted by the Obama Administration, the federal “bureaucracy” that is the “United States Government”, the inaugural campaign and the mainstream and so-called “left, liberal” media. No doubt the election and coming presidency is being heralded and compared to that of “The Great Emancipator”, Abraham Lincoln, but even before Obama has taken office. Quite dangerous, to say the least, if you are familiar with the rise of totalitarian, “cult of personality”, fascist dictatorships.(See Naomi Wolf’s book “The End of America” or read or listen to any Webster Griffin Tarpley) I just want to remind you tools of the true nature of Lincoln’s presidency and his views on slavery, African American’s in general and the true causes of the so-called “Civil War”.(Which, by the way, was not, by the true definition of civil war, a civil war at all. Since civil war is defined as a conflict between factions or sections of a nation, it turns out the MAJORITY OF CITIZENS in each southern state comprising the Confederacy had FREELY ELECTED TO LEAVE THE UNION, hence not making the United States united or a “union” anymore. In fact Confederate PRESIDENT Davis said in his inaugural address on Feb. 18, 1861 that “the American idea that government rests upon the consent of the governed, and that it is the right of the people to alter or abolish a government whenever it becomes destructive of the ends for which it was established. The declared purposes of the compact of Union from which we have withdrawn were to establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, to provide for the common defense, to promote the general welfare, and to secure the blessings of liberty for ourselves and our posterity; and when in the judgment of the sovereign States now comprising this Confederacy it had been perverted from the purposes for which it was ordained, and had ceased to answer the ends for which it was established, an appeal to the ballot box declared that so far as they were concerned the government created by that compact should cease to exist. In this they merely asserted a right, which the Declaration of Independence of 1776 defined to be inalienable… When they entered into the Union of 1789, it was with the undeniable recognition of the power of the people to resume the authority delegated for the purposes of that government whenever, in their opinion, its functions were perverted and its ends defeated.” He went on to say that the sovereign states comprising the Confederacy do so by their own will as constituted by the Declaration and the Constitution and is only by an abuse of language that this act was deemed a “revolution” by the United States(Union) government at the time.)
    Anyhow, any properly educated historian or economist will tell you that the conflict that took place on this continent between 1861 and 1865, otherwise known as the “Civil War”, was fought over economics and not slavery. It is widely known that the South wanted to buy cheaper imported European products, but the powerful Northern manufacturers imposed strict import tariffs on such products. All the while, as some researchers make the claim, war between the two regions of the United States was being provoked by international financiers and European banking interests seeking to take control over the United States, fearing an end to their own hegemony and control over the issuance and control over capital and natural resources. It is also widely known by astute students of monetary policy and banking in this country and abroad, that after the War of 1812(sometimes called the 2nd War for American Independence), President Andrew Jackson had already quelled the national debt, put off repeated attempts at creating a central bank in this country and in the next year, halted inflation caused by overzealous land speculation by ordering that public lands be sold only for gold or silver. All of this strengthened the United States after the defeat of the British in the War of 1812, furthering the military and economic might of the United States.
    Anyhow, back to Lincoln. It is widely known(only the history books don’t tell) that Lincoln’s views(his own words say enough) towards African Americans at the time when these European banking interests sought to use the United States’ regional differences in hopes of exploiting and dividing the United States(divide and conquer), were nothing less than contemptuous at best. In his famous 4th debate with Stephen Douglass on September 18th, 1858 Lincoln said, “I will say, then, that I AM NOT NOR HAVE EVER BEEN in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the black and white races—that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with White people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the White and black races which will ever FORBID the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together, there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I, as much as any other man, am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the White race.” It is also widely known(to those who study history) that throughout much of Lincoln’s presidency he advocated colonization. That is. a deporting of all blacks to Haiti and Liberia.
    So, it wasn’t until his famous Emancipation Proclamation on Jan. 1, 1863 that Lincoln “freed all slaves in rebel held territory.” Most regard this as a purely political act since technically Lincoln had no authority in the sovereign Confederacy at the time of the proclamation. It was also a purely strategic act. It brought the issue of slavery to the forefront of the conflict. Lincoln explained this strategic gesture by stating, “Things had gone from bad to worse, until I felt that we reached the end of our rope on the plan we had pursuing; that we had about played our last card, and must change our tactics or lose the game. I now determined upon the adoption of the emancipation policy.” So it was only halfway through the conflict that slavery(not Lincoln’s personal views on race mind you) became a central issue in the Civil War.
    With that being said, it is safe to say that Lincoln truly believed the institution of slavery to be “a moral, social and political evil.” I believe it is integral to note as well that Lincoln was wholly committed to saving the Union, which he demonstrated in his letter to New York Tribune editor and founder Horace Greeley, where he said, “If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that.” It is also integral to note that with that being said, Lincoln demonstrated in the very next sentence, that he was putting his personal beliefs on race aside when he said, “What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union.”
    The Proclamation was a brilliant strategic maneuver and it was one of two deciding factors in the North’s victory over the South. The other was Russia’s quiet intervention to keep the preying English and French forces at bay. With that being said, it is also integral to note that Lincoln was the first president to institute a military draft, where subsequently, riots broke out in several major cities in the North because of it. To control insurrection in the North due to the reaction to conscription, Lincoln trampled the Constitution by suspending habeas corpus(right to see a judge and appeal against unlawful imprisonment. It must be noted though, that Section 9 of the US Constitution allows suspension of habeas corpus in “cases of rebellion or invasion”, (some say) a flaw and obvious loop hole in the Constitution, utilized not only in this instance by Lincoln, but by Bush the son, after the Sept. 11 attacks and rationalized by the “War on Terror”.).
    Essentially as described by author G. Edward Griffin, not only were American citizens in the North “killed in the streets of their own cities, but they were put into military combat against their own will and/or thrown into prison without due process of the law.” Essentially, says Jim Marrs in “Rule by Secrecy, “free men were enslaved so slaves could be made free”. And all done under the guise of opposing slavery.
    So to make a long story short, take heed when you see the establishment throwing around these comparisons of Lincoln and Barack Obama and vice versa, for if anyone wishes to contest, I have a hard time seeing any comparisons at all except the color of Obama’s skin tone in relation to those who Lincoln supposedly “freed”.
    One last thing I must note, it is interesting to point out that the two U.S. Presidents that have issued their own debt free currencies in defiance of the international banking cartels and financiers, Lincoln’s “Greenback” and Kennedy’s “U.S. Treasury note”, were both killed by assassin’s bullets. Go figure.

    Comment by FED PHARMICUETICALS # January 18, 2009 at 2:57 pm

54. bo knows 1:03
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILXRs-lvEog

    Comment by bo knows 1:03 # January 18, 2009 at 4:32 pm

55. Mr. Bo

    Comment by FED PHARMICUETICALS # January 18, 2009 at 6:11 pm

56. Mr.fed

    Comment by bo # January 18, 2009 at 9:50 pm

57. Yo, sorry about all the grammatical errors in that book up there. As I read I cringe in horror at my inability to have proofread that behemoth. I simply needed to get that shit off the chest and unfortunately I didn’t proofread it for dick. Anyhow, I think you understizand what I’m getting at. Word up, pussies.

    Comment by FED PHARMICUETICALS # January 18, 2009 at 10:15 pm

58. Didn’t see you online tonight….I guess you’re
    out “proofreading for dick” again. Oh well, good luck. Hope you find some.

    Comment by Bo-bby Knows Back Alleys # January 19, 2009 at 12:16 am

59. http://thebrooklynavocado.blogspot.com/
    http://thebrooklynavocado.blogspot.com/
    http://thebrooklynavocado.blogspot.com/

    give up foodswings…..

    Comment by ChrisField # January 19, 2009 at 3:26 am

60. Great “attack”. That was about the absolute, single most corniest “comment” I have ever read on Tearies. You are truly a half-wit and I’m not even going to waste my time commenting on how ridiculous this was or how badly coordinated or constructed it is. What I am going to do is repost it for everyone to see and hear again just how shit ass pepper corny and friggin asshole stupid you really sound:

    “Didn’t see you online tonight….I guess you’re
    out “proofreading for dick” again. Oh well, good luck. Hope you find some.”

    Comment by Bo-bby Knows Back Alleys

    Comment by FED PHARMICUETICALS # January 19, 2009 at 9:17 am

61. “Oh well, good luck. Hope you find some.”

    What a frickin doof-ass.

    Comment by FED PHARMICUETICALS # January 19, 2009 at 9:18 am

62. Now onto some real shit. Here’s the trailer for the Corbett Report’s (no, not the Colbert Report, doof-ass) new docu, “Al-Qaeda Doesn’t Exist”, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnnI3IRFweQ
    Check it befo yo wreck it.

    Comment by FED PHARMICUETICALS # January 19, 2009 at 9:22 am

63. “Bo-bby Knows Back Alleys”

    Good fruckin shit lord.

    Comment by FED PHARMICUETICALS # January 19, 2009 at 9:23 am

64. “Didn’t see you online tonight”

    Comment by FED PHARMICUETICALS # January 19, 2009 at 9:24 am

65. “I guess you’re out “proofreading for dick” again.”

    Comment by FED PHARMICUETICALS # January 19, 2009 at 9:25 am

66. “oh well”

    Comment by FED PHARMICUETICALS # January 19, 2009 at 9:25 am

67. “good luck. Hope you find some.”

    Comment by FED PHARMICUETICALS # January 19, 2009 at 9:26 am

68. BAHHH HAAA HAAA HAAA!!!!!!

    Comment by FED PHARMICUETICALS # January 19, 2009 at 9:26 am

69. What are you 8 yrs old?

    Comment by FED PHARMICUETICALS # January 19, 2009 at 9:29 am

70. Looks like homeboy got to you dog…..they dun got to you real good-like. You need to learn how to take that shit on the chin, mate. Just like you do in dem back alleys. But that was just a joke, not a dose of man-milk. So I guess it may take some practice.

    Comment by YOuCaNTsHitterWithoUtaTowEl # January 19, 2009 at 10:04 am

71. has anyone else noticed toymachines unwavering support for the naked emperor barak obama? in fact, just recently, a customer wrote in commenting on how they felt it disturbing a company, whose core demographic is children, would post on their website political propaganda.
    “…I noticed that your
    company openly supports Barack Obama. I can’t believe you have the nerve to try and influence young kids politically by posting his name on your product web page. Just sad. I will not be buying anything from Toy Machine.” wrote the individual. Ed templeton responded: “Not supporting companies you don’t like is the real power we regular people have in this country…We at Toy Machine are not journalists and have no obligation to be unbiased or “fair and balanced.” If you want “fair and balanced” watch Fox News…Toy Machine will not cower silently in the corner hoping people buy our boards because a few Republican nut-jobs don’t want us to..We don’t wear blinders to what is happening in our world…I would never knowingly support a company that supported George Bush.” the comments section to eds post was litterd with “fukk ya’s” from ed’s “loyal pawns”. im sure ed was damned proud. little does he know hes a perfect example of how ignorant and ill informed “..regular people” in this country really are. what a motivation to keep educating yourself and trying your damnedest to put the puzzle pieces together and speak out.
    heres the link: http://www.toymachine.com
    /events/

    Comment by wino # January 19, 2009 at 10:29 am

72. oh and this book club idea is great! i cant wait to find an act of state at my local book shop, undoubtedly stashed back by the wall calenders in the “speculation” section. keep em’ coming theorizer!

    Comment by wino # January 19, 2009 at 10:36 am

73. “YOuCaNTsHitterWithoUtaTowEl”

    Comment by FED PHARMICUETICALS # January 19, 2009 at 12:06 pm

74. yeah, really “got me”, “dog”.

    Comment by FED PHARMICUETICALS # January 19, 2009 at 12:06 pm

75. [...] reading the book “An Act of State“, which is probably the best and most in-depth investigation into the MLK assassination, I [...]

    Pingback by Theories of Atlantis » Never Forget…..Martin Luther King Jr Day # January 17, 2010 at 9:31 pm