Time Machine #13: Jeremy Deglopper
Easily 90% of you never heard of him, but this southern California ripper should not be forgotten.
This footage goes far beyond the usual 10yr old mark for a Theories Time Machine. This short grip of footage of Jeremy is from 1996, when most of you were still eating glue and having to raise your hands to use the bathroom.
I wish there was more, Deglopper’s style was ahead of it’s time. Enjoy.
I know The Towel is gonna flip his Mets hat over me posting a new post, calling attention away from his most recent comments.
So I’ll encourage you all to look back at the last posts comments.
As for the numerology shit he’s been talking about lately, there’s a lot of smoke there, but I think there’s actually some fire.
As John Judge said “I’ll call myself a conspiracy theorist if you call yourself a coincidence theorist”. There is far too much coincidence going on here for it to be, well, a coincidence. And the theory that this shit is all the result of a Black Op is not unfounded. It’s a solid pattern that’s been going on for deep. See Waco, Oklahoma City, Columbine, Virginia Tech, etc, etc.
Anyways, just saying….don’t discount that stuff so easily w/out giving it some more thought and research.
Comment by Theorizer # November 8, 2009 at 9:35 pm
“Easily 90% of you never heard of him” What makes you think everyone is so young and you are so wise? He skated for treefort , and was sick! no need for the insults.
Comment by Wino # November 8, 2009 at 9:45 pm
I was more referring to the fact that he rode for a company called TREEFORT…..and I doubt that many people on the east coast were privy. But touche’ my friend.
Comment by Theorizer # November 8, 2009 at 9:48 pm
What the hell are you doing? Are you actually serious right now? You are, aren’t you! When I first saw this post, I honestly thought it was a joke. I honestly thought this was a fake name, and that you were actually poking some fun at yourself for the absolute gay shit you post on this website. But you’re not. You’re 100% serious. “Jeremy DE-GLOPPER”???!!! What the hell is a De-Glopper? Is that something that removes “Glop”? I barely remember this dude and probably for some decent reason. First off, Tree Fart was never cool. Not then, not now. Just cause it had Vinny Ponte and he like went to fake college in Boston or some shit, this did not make that brand cool. That brand was as San Diego hip hop as you could possibly get and it stunk of it. It was horrible. The only reason you might have thought it was cool is because a.) it was small(again, probably for a good reason) and b.) it had a cool name(like it reminded you of running away from all the problems of the world into your little imaginary tree fart where you could be “Theorizer”). The only thing Tree Fart might have done was establish the aesthetic that Element was to eventually rip off and currently employ. In all seriousness, Jeremy DeGlopper’s prolly a nice guy and a good skateboarder(really, who’s not “good”?). But him? A Time Machine?? Just say that name over and over and that should’ve been enough reason not to have even considered this a worthy post for your readership. Anyhow, what’s done is done. You’re gonna have to walk this one out. I might go out on a limb here and say this is by far the worst shit you’ve ever tried to sell your readers. “A Jeremy DeGlopper Time Machine.” Say that again. “A Jeremy DeGlopper Time Machine”! What is that? A new low for sure. Now, on to the second part of The Stewart Effect comment 1. For one, I don’t care if you change posts. Obviously it’s a necessary function for maintaining the site. My problem is how you have a blatant disregard for what your readers are actually talking about and consider important. Like in this post, what do you expect your readers to say? “Aw, that was a cool inward heel flip to nose manual to nollie late front foot kickflip out! Rock on De-Glopper!!!!”? I mean seriously. And then you play dumb, like your SO busy at HBO to read your site or actually post something that matters. Jeremy Deglopper was not cool then and he’s not cool now(again, I’ve never met the dude. Probably a nice guy and I’m sorry it has to be him taking this one. If it wasn’t him, it woulda been somebody like Wayne Patrick or someone else Stewart’s skewed sense of perception picked up on his Floridar(that’s Florida + radar).) But to go as far as to suggest that the numerology aspect of the Ft. Hood shooter is “shit”(because that is how you referred to it, as “numerology shit”, which is definitely suggestive of it being dis-credible, is it not?) and that it’s a lot of “smoke”(as in smoke and mirrors?), is also highly suggestive of it being implausible. So what’s it gonna be? Is there fire or is there not fire? There can’t be smoke without fire, Stewart. But the absolute best thing about the smoke comment (as well as the tip toeing around actually looking into my claim or acknowledging the fact that all of my claims are based on pretty accurate depictions of past events that have all claimed some occult marking other than their hard facts or holes, that absolutely secure the claim that they are black ops) is the fact that you just put out that “Theories 11″ shirt. That shirt is based entirely around this so called “numerological shit”. Is the numerological significance in the name of that shirt not the absolute basis for naming that shirt “11″? If it wasn’t, you would have named it something like “The Eleventh”, or “Inside Job”. Your whole tone in comment 1 stinks to the high heavens of The Stewart Effect. Instead of giving us something of substance, you give us Jeremy Deglopper. Instead of recognizing (or at least researching and opening up or expanding a wider discussion) you give us Jeremy Deglopper.. You never cease to amaze me with this shit Stewart. I suppose so now we can discount all of the numerological markings around the 9/11 as “numerological shit” and as “a lot of smoke” and “some fire”? Your song and dance is becoming more and more noticeable and more laughable each time you do this shit. But it doesn’t surprise me. Thanks for the Jeremy Deglopper Time Machine. You don’t mind if I keep posting my opinion’s and editorial on your website, do ya?
Comment by The Towel # November 9, 2009 at 9:49 am
Stewart, go look at my website. That is what a well informed and responsible poster looks like. You can thank me(and him) when you’re done clicking through all those links.
Comment by Jeremy Detowel # November 9, 2009 at 9:55 am
Don’t you retards see what’s going on here?
Comment by Jeremy Detowel # November 9, 2009 at 9:55 am
Oh no please, keep it up. I LOVE your opinions. They bring rosy smiles to my face and a million tiny rainbows to my heart.
Comment by Theorizer # November 9, 2009 at 10:04 am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3ubHuD1QuM&feature=fvw
Comment by Wino # November 9, 2009 at 10:27 am
Now, Mr. McTowel, once again you’ve read between lines and gotten the wrong message. The quote I used about “there’s a lot of smoke there, but there’s some fire” is taken directly from the film JFK. It’s simply me agreeing with you that there is something going on here of significance with the Ft. Hood shooting. It’s obvious. But 99% of Theories readers are not going to pick up on it and they’re going to have a hard time buying the concept of mind-control. Especially as used by the underground operations of the CIA and military. To the common citizen, mind-control and MK Ultra sound like absolute crazed fiction. It will take a lot of baby steps to lead readers down that road toward considering it as even possible. It took me reading countless books about the most significant assassinations of the 20th century to eventually accept that mind-control is not only a legitimate theory, it’s an outright living and breathing weapons program orchestrated and run in the murky black-operations of our own government.
Also of great significance is the diversion that the Ft. Hood shooting provided from the health care vote. Has anybody ever noticed/wondered why every single time an important piece of legislation is up for a vote something provides a huge distraction in the public eye? I mean, this is straight from the play book. This is one of the strongest signs that the health care bill is not all it’s cracked up to be. We need to have a serious look at this thing.
But, let me address the Jeremy Deglopper Time Machine. Theories is a website that is visited mostly for it’s skateboarding-related content. I’ll post what I want and it doesn’t make me irresponsible or a sellout or a “joke. Jeremy Deglopper was a little-known and amazing skater who never got much attention by the skate media. He had flow and style and a very east coast approach to skating.
Treefort was a silly company. I thought I made that clear in my comment above. I never said it was cool or anywhere close. But some of the skaters were really tight and Deglopper was the tightest. But you’re right, we probably should just write him off because of the name he was given by birth. That’s definitely the way we should choose the skaters we want to support.
And I wasn’t dismissing your “numerological shit” by any means. If you actually READ my comment you’d see that I was defending your argument from the people who were saying it was crazy. Obviously I’m a believer in it’s significance if I made a shirt based around the concept and I’ve blogged about it for years.
You know, at first, the sound of a barking dog in the neighborhood will keep people awake at night. But after weeks and weeks of incessant unprovoked noise, the sound eventually just gets lost in the night air. It becomes muted by it’s own relentlessness. Pick your battles mate…..not everything is a war.
Comment by Theorizer # November 9, 2009 at 10:34 am
http://theberrics.com/dailyopspost.php?postid=1480
Comment by Wino # November 9, 2009 at 10:51 am
ha
Comment by Wino # November 9, 2009 at 10:52 am
Then why make it one?
Comment by Jeremy Detowel # November 9, 2009 at 11:20 am
Thanks for outlining my points.
Comment by Jeremy Detowel # November 9, 2009 at 11:20 am
You’re kidding me right? A line in the film “JFK”? Do I have to spend all of my time going into the benefit of the corporate and “pop” media’s watering down and diluting the significance of the JFK assassination right now? No doubt the film exposed many people to the possibility of a black op, but that is exactly where the film stopped. You’re not trying to suggest that JFK was an actual exposure of just how deep this thing goes, are you? If you are, you must be the one who is truly delusional. Comparing the work of Oliver Stone, in this instance, to the handful of people who actually exposed the op for what it really was is like comparing the work of say, Michael Moore to that of Jason Bermas. The entire fact that the assassination plot was made into a major motion picture actually propels the idea that this is the stuff that movies and “conspiracy theories” are made of. Can’t you see the significance in the act of releasing it as a major motion picture? It makes it sooo easy to discount. Oliver Stone? You must be kidding me! It leads very few people to actually dig further into the op to find out just who was responsible for it because they accept this shit for as truth. Hollywood dictating history. No matter how accurate the details in the movie were, that movie ended very open endedly. The black op at that point in time had been thoroughly documented by many great writers, insiders, whistle blowers and investigative journalists. In fact the Stone film was based entirely on the work of someone else! To compare that film with any one of the really great books written(and films produced) exposing the intricacies involved in the plot and the ramification’s of it today, is absolutely irresponsible. That film ends the exact same way some of these Nat Geo and History Channel 9/11 “documentaries” end, leaving the viewer totally confounded as to what is and was really at play here. Like I said, Oliver Stone had a perfectly good opportunity to expose the op for what it was, just like Michael Moore had the same opportunity to expose the 9/11 op. But instead they both caved to the corporately control propaganda arm of the establishment and chose to further propagate the false Left/Right paradigm, the “conspiratorial view” of history and the idea that Corporate media is safe and that “they wouldn’t lie”. And if that wasn’t the be all end all, Oliver Stone goes on to make a “biop” about G.W. Bush!!! I mean come on here Stewart. If that was not a total whitewash of the Bush Administration and what one would call “damage control”, then I don’t know what is. Oliver Stone is a corporate stooge that got played(or rather hooked) into the grandeur of a corporate hand out. (Anyone see a likeness here?) He absolutely discredited(in my eyes), anything he might have accomplished with JFK when he released the Bush “biop”. Yeah, he really “exposed the truth”! And then what? Shoveled dirt on the family that was integral in executing it with a squeaky Bush biop? Real dedication to the cause! Come on Stewart. You can’t really be coming at me with another load of crock like this. I’m not that easy to trick like some of your other lemming readers. But regardless, you really did nothing more with that fake good guy diatribe in comment 9 than re-outline every single point I’ve already made concerning the Ft. Hood shooter and past black ops. So I thank you for that. But just for the record, there is no such thing as a Southern California approach to “east coast skating”. East Coast skating is wholly dependent upon spots, aesthetic and the appropriate approach. While true there is a such thing as an East Coast approach to Southern California style skating, the opposite is not possible. Sure you can take a Southern Californian(or a Floridian) and drop them in an “East Coast setting” (and let’s be honest here,”A NORTH EAST setting and approach”), unfortunately it’s not the real thing. Also, the opposite is just not possible. You can not mimic aesthetic or spot factor in California. You can “Danny Mimmick it”, but the opposite just doesn’t exist. So I can care less about someone’s “approach”. If it was good then, there would be no reason to revisit or draw attention to it now. This post feels desperate. I might point while I’m at it, you saying shit like “we need to have a serious look at this thing(The Health Care Bill)”. Well let’s go, start blogging about it. Instead of posting bullshit like a Jeremy Deglopper Time Machine (and then crying about it when it gets called bullshit) and bitching about my thoughts and opinions, let’s have a good hard look at what your thoughts are on this Health Care Bill. I mean this is a huge bill that will affect all of us for generations to come. In effect, it’s putting our health care in the hands of the “people”(or I should say “institutions”) that are actively engaged in killing us! Go read President Obama’s “Science Czar”, John Holdren’s book “Eco Science”, where he advocates forced abortions and mass sterilizations. In it he says shit like:
-Women could be forced to abort their pregnancies, whether they wanted to or not;
-The population at large could be sterilized by infertility drugs intentionally put into the nation’s drinking water or in food
-Single mothers and teen mothers should have their babies seized from them against their will and given away to other couples to raise
-People who “contribute to social deterioration” (i.e. undesirables) “can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility” In other words, be compelled to have abortions or be sterilized.
-A transnational “Planetary Regime” should assume control of the global economy and also dictate the most intimate details of Americans’ lives using an armed international police force. A “Planetary Regime” with the power of life and death over American citizens!!!
Or you can just wait till I post something about it and then say, “Yeah, what he said! We need to look at this!” Good try, but it’s not gonna work this time either. E for Effort.
Comment by Jeremy DeTowel # November 9, 2009 at 12:50 pm
Ha!, http://jebers.com/images/internet_dog.jpg
Oh, the irony!
Comment by Mr. McTowel # November 9, 2009 at 1:02 pm
“DeGlopper was the tightest.”
Comment by A dingo ate my DeGlopper! # November 9, 2009 at 2:26 pm
Is that cartoon drawn by a “P Steiner”? That is pretty ironic.
Comment by Bryan # November 9, 2009 at 2:34 pm
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_sniper_grip_of_fear
my psy hurts
Comment by zing # November 9, 2009 at 6:46 pm
damn, that was fucking sick… good watch.
also, towel needs to SAVE IT!!!
Comment by ur boy # November 9, 2009 at 9:06 pm
I’ve been curious as these posts continue between Bobby and Josh, and because i’m a skatenerd. Are you guy’s still cool outside of this website? Do you guy’s still film and skateboard together? Or is there actually some kind of beef or dislike beyond the blog land?
Comment by Bryan # November 9, 2009 at 10:08 pm
By the way i am not the same Bryan in post 17.
Comment by Bryan # November 9, 2009 at 10:09 pm
Jimmy Chadwick rode for Treefort as well I think.. That dude killed it too. I remember seeing Deglopper’s part and wondering why I never had heard of the guy. Either way, good little chunk of footage.
Comment by Psyched Floridian # November 9, 2009 at 10:12 pm
So sick.
Comment by buchmann # November 9, 2009 at 11:28 pm
You guys need to get laid
Towel, If you channeled your energy into pretty much anything other than how Josh is not on par with your vision of who’s cool in Skateboarding, You might not die of a brain aneurism in your mid forties. In all seriousness Bobby Puleo is prolly not nice guy and a good skateboarder(really, who’s not “good”)?.
Comment by kickfliped your bump to bar # November 9, 2009 at 11:44 pm
I think all he said was it’s from the film JFK….Not, “It’s from JFK the best investigative film ever on the JFK assassination, Oliver Stone is a fucking genius.” You spent almost ten paragraphs destroying Oliver Stone when that had nothing to do with the comment? He basically could of said it’s from Jim Marrs Crossfire, because I believe that’s what that movie was based off of. But some random kid on this site will see Jim Marrs and the word book, and will look no further. (Not saying all the readers here are that stupid) Maybe when they realize it’s a movie they might watch it. Also i’ve seen History channel pieces on JFK and they completely dismiss every conspiracy theory…
Comment by Blank # November 10, 2009 at 5:58 am
Damn, that’s funny the cartoon is drawn by a “P.Steiner.” Not spelled the same, but still pretty funny.
Towel, what do you mean by “it’s not the real thing?” Wait I forgot, you are the official East Coast (Northeast, let’s be honest here) judge of who and what is legitimate.
Comment by Psyched Floridian # November 10, 2009 at 10:05 am
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Internet,_nobody_knows_you‘re_a_dog
Comment by TongueBath # November 10, 2009 at 11:28 am
Check out this promo for Rob Starr’s video “Barefoot in Baltimore.” Raw Baltimore skateboarding!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1JF5bwyXpU&feature=player_embedded
Comment by Barefoot In Baltimore # November 10, 2009 at 11:47 am
26, What I meant is that it’s basically spot rape and aesthetic rape. 25, you seem not to be familiar with the Stewart Effect. You see the only reason he would use that particular phrase was because it was a loaded phrase. It was meant to be reacted to and when the reaction took place he could respond with something like, “What?!? That’s a line from the Oliver Stone film JFK!!! And so by him calling it “a lot of smoke and some fire” it reflects this idea that by using that particular phrase, he is somehow backed up by the idea that the movie, in Josh’s mind, is an “authority” on the assassination, but in reality it is really just the Hollywood depiction of the assassination(and not to mention, Josh’s favorite movie). Don’t get me wrong, the movie’s quite accurate. The problem I had with it was with the ending. You see you can bet your money that if something goes mainstream like that, the establishment has either approved it for a specific purpose or mutated it, also for a specific purpose. Look, I told myself I was not going to get embroiled in this shit anymore, but just to make a point, have you ever heard the story of Loose Change Final Cut and Mark Cuban? Well Loose Change Second Edition was the most widely viewed film in internet history. Mark Cuban, a billionaire entrepreneur, owner of the Dallas Mavericks, and Chairman of HDNet, an HDTV cable network, in March 2007, told the New York Post that he was having discussions about distributing Lopse Change Final Cut. Shortly thereafter, it was announced that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed a civil suit against Mark Cuban relating to alleged insider trading which is alleged to have saved him from a loss of $750,000. $750,000 is peanuts, but they fully went after him. He was also acquitted. So you can either say that was some coincidence or that he was basically targeted by the “establishment” for even thinking of producing this film. I can go deeper into the psychological effects of media manipulation, but told myself I would not dedicate more time and energy to Stewart’s ridiculous little games and straw men. All in all, you can call me insane, call me hated, call me whatever you like, I could care less. I never said I was an authority on anything, but I have been around the block a few times and believe my credentials are on the wall in the “Theories” bathroom. So take it for what it’s worth. I know some of you don’t like having your bubbles burst and it feels good to attack my character. Try making a valid point here or showing me some credentials and maybe I’ll dedicate more time to an honest discussion. 19, thanks for the advice, 20, our relationship started to deteriorate when we I saw he put a trick of Nick Jenson skating a spot that I skated first a certain way before mine. I absolutely believe that if a skateboarder finds a apot or skates a spot a certain way that it should be presented in video in that order. Otherwise it paints a false picture and gives credit to the skateboarder who was copying. Our relationship fluctuates based on the amount of ridiculous shit that comes out of his mouth or based on what he says and then what he actually does. 22, I agree Jimmy Chadwick was sick. So is Jeremy Deglopper. It’s just this post was out of left field and I thought that was both funny and pathetic. 24, thanks for the advice, when is your mommy available? 25, again, it had everything to do with the comment. The quote is not from Jim Marr’s Crossfire. If it was, Stewart would have paraded it around. Cool, if they watch the movie, great! The movie’s great. What I said is that it doesn’t completely expose what was at play. That movie doesn’t once mention George H. W. Bush or the Bush cartel. I’m not sure if I understand your last comment on the History Channel dismissing every conspiracy theory. What I said is that the film didn’t expose the whole plot. Of course the History Channel debunked or dismissed the “conspiracy theories”. That’s what it was supposed to do. Just in the same way JFK the film didn’t expose the whole plot. Like I said, Oliver Stone had choices. The choices he made really made me question his motives.
Comment by Towel McTowel # November 10, 2009 at 12:32 pm
The cartoon is by Peter Steiner from page 61 of the July 5, 1993 issue of The New Yorker. I got a memory like a steel sieve.
Comment by Towel McTowel # November 10, 2009 at 12:36 pm
Can anyone say “Manchurian Candidate”? http://www.am1500.com/link/NY_PostFeds_knew_about_email_to_al_Qaeda_from_killer_at_Ft_Hood
This is becoming laughable.
Comment by Ft. Towel # November 10, 2009 at 2:38 pm
“killing 13 and injuring 29″
Comment by Ft. Towel # November 10, 2009 at 2:43 pm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Manchurian_Candidate
Comment by Towelpedia # November 10, 2009 at 2:44 pm
“Oh, but that only happens in the movies.”
Comment by Wag the Towel # November 10, 2009 at 2:45 pm
In comment 29, I meant to say, and to be more concise, that our relationship started to deteriorate after I saw Stewart put a trick of Nick Jenson in Static 2 before my trick skating the same spot the same way I skated it first. I absolutely believe it to be true that if a skateboarder finds a spot or skates a spot in a way that no one else has skated that spot first, then it should be presented in that order in a video(if the tricks are in the same video obviously) regardless of order of parts. Otherwise it paints a false picture and gives credit to the skateboarder who did not think of skating the spot that certain way or didn’t find the spot. Unfortunately this has become an unavoidable part of spot and street skating and this is why I find it imperative to make sure the history and credit is accurate. Most of the time this is the responsibility of the film maker, or at the very least the responsibility of the film maker to make sure the skater’s involved are cool with the decision and to move forward accordingly. This really bothered me about Josh’s editing (and “spot seeking”) ethics and began a long standing grudge based on the idea that I thought that not only was he capable of painting false pictures through manipulation of medium, but also he was putting business in front of ethics of not only “friendship”, but also ethics in skateboarding. I also saw a carelessness to be inventive or to observe what I thought was an obvious law of editing. Like I said, in this case it was the manipulation of the order of the tricks(which I believe is very important, but also to the dictation of spot and street skating “history”(his-story), which I also consider to be very important to the history and legacy of “real” street skating). Anyhow, the icing on the cake was when he did it to me a second time in Static 3. I began to question Stewart’s motives and his dedication to the so called “underground” element of street skating and street skating in general, as well as that friendship and sort of unspoken code. With this all said, I’m was not trying to say that Nick Jenson “copyed” me, as that statement may have come out wrong in comment 29. Obviously it’s a huge compliment to see someone skate a spot the same way you do or did, because obviously that person is recognizing the source of their inspiration and in a sense, it’s an act of respect. Or it’s spot rape. It all depends on how it goes down. Either way, you get the picture. I absolutely guarantee Stewart will come on here and say that there was no other way to have edited the trick into the video because the London part preceded my part where my tricks where featured. This is only true if you think there is only one way of editing a video(or tricks). Obviously there are hundreds, and only if you have a limited vision and little motivation or are not conscious of the feelings of the people around. It is also true if you consciously make a decision not to adhere to a sense of codes in film making or “street skating” just to get something “done”. Stewart had many possibilities open to him to present the tricks in “order” and yet he chose to not observe what I believe to be a tenet in not only video making and editing, but also street skating. Like I said, if someone does something first on a spot or introduces a new way of skating that new spot and others follow that lead, then that person should be the first person to introduce the spot. Does this resonate with anyone or does anyone disagree with this principle or idea?
Comment by Towel One # November 10, 2009 at 4:11 pm
Also, if anyone wants a good laugh, Google: “Feds Knew”. I just did to retrieve that Post story. Holy shit, what a laugh/eye opener/interesting juxtaposition!
Comment by Towel Two # November 10, 2009 at 4:26 pm
Better think twice about wearing your Theories “11″ shirt! http://www.infowars.com/upi-editor-equates-911-truth-activists-with-fort-hood-killer/
Comment by Towel Two # November 10, 2009 at 10:51 pm
Also, if anyone wants a good laugh google: “Why do black people” and don’t click enter
Comment by TongueBath # November 11, 2009 at 7:14 am
so u dissolved a friendship because ur friend used a trick in his video in a sequence that u didnt approve of? and better yet it was on a spot in not only a city u werent from but a whole other country? and on a spot u didnt find on ur own, that u were actually brought to by locals, but that u happened to skate a little differently than had been skated before. altho mark channer had skated it pretty much the same way but in a much more difficult way than u years before? sorry im just trying to get this all straight cuz if this is all true it is astounding in its hypocrisy and absurdity.
Comment by Wake Your Own Dead # November 11, 2009 at 7:17 am
wwwwwooooooooooooowwww. I love this shit. It’s like the watching soaps at home but with skaters and you have to read it instaead of watch it and, hold on, that actually sucks. This is gay.
Ok, hows about this little nuggety nugget: An interesting story was once told to me by my boy the Stay Puft Marshmellow Man, that Bobby once took Nate Broussard to one of his spots in New York. I believe he was filming for Static thrice. But once Nate did a trick he wanted to film on it, Bobby grew green with envy and flipped his wig, proceeding to kick them out of the spot he’d just taken them to.
But here’s the clincher. If this was the soaps, we’d be forced to go to commercial first before we got to find out this gem. Nate was skating the spot in a DIFFERENT way than Bobby ever had. In a way that Bobby probably couldn’t. So, by Bobby’s own reasoning, as he’s so thoroughly explained above, it is an important natural progression for someone to approach skating a spot in a new way, and not only should be allowed to happen, but should be encouraged and celebrated.
But apparently it doesn’t work the other way around. When it’s Bobby’s spot, we’re not allowed to progress the skating or add our own interpretation. Shocker!
Stay at home moms “Gasp”, credits roll and cut to commercial.
Comment by Snuggles, the fabric softening bear # November 11, 2009 at 9:34 am
ding ding ding!!!
Comment by oop # November 11, 2009 at 1:18 pm
sonned?
Comment by jon lee snooker # November 11, 2009 at 4:08 pm
40. Absolutely not true. I went to said spot with Josh Stewart who had Nate Broussard in tow(as usual), to film my trick, at my spot that I found. What really happened is Josh Stewart actually suggested to Nate Broussard(and in front of me) that he try and do the trick he just suggested. I said fuck that to Josh and Nate and shut them both down. For one I wanted to see Nate actually work for his tricks in NY. Two, I found that spot after putting a lot of energy into combing many neighborhoods in Queens. Three, let fucking Nate Broussard think of his own tricks. Four, let Nate Broussard find his own spots. You think I wanted Nate Broussard coming out with me when I go film? Hell no. I only had Nate with me cause Stewart was playing Da-Da that day. Fuck that shit. This is my business we’re talking about here. It’s also my art and my passion. This shit ain’t free. I ain’t giving away spots and I’m sorry that you interpreted it that way. So yeah I shut em down. There’s tissues in the bathroom. They could have always gone back or told me to fuck off. I wonder why they didn’t? Why don’t you try getting your facts straight the next time you relay a story based on hearsay. Good try.
Comment by Towel Two # November 11, 2009 at 4:54 pm
“An interesting story was once told to me” -Snuggles, the fabric softening bear
Comment by Son of Towel # November 11, 2009 at 4:57 pm
“Bobby once took Nate Broussard to one of his spots”.
Comment by Son of Towel # November 11, 2009 at 4:57 pm
There is no way in hell I would ever take Nate Broussard to one of my spots. It was in fact Josh Stewart that took Nate Broussard to one of my spots. Get your shit straight son.
Comment by Son of Towel # November 11, 2009 at 4:59 pm
39. Sorry, never saw the Mark Channer trick. To this day I’ve never seen it. I’d also say it was not more “difficult”, I’d say it took more power. Get your shit straight. And like I said, I was told he skated it that way only because I asked. Also, we actually stopped at that spot on the way to another spot skating around the city. Like I said, the “locals” never thought of skating that way. Sorry about your sacking.
Comment by Son of Towel # November 11, 2009 at 5:05 pm
“Nate, do you think you could ollie over the step into the door?” -Josh Stewart to Nate Broussard
Comment by Sons of Towel # November 11, 2009 at 5:07 pm
A faulty memory is never a good thing to rely on or especially base an argument around. Sorry dudes. Especially valiant try on this one.
Comment by Sons of Towel # November 11, 2009 at 5:09 pm
Now, onto some real shit. Check out paragraph 7 in this Associated Press article, http://www.abc15.com/news/national/story/DC-sniper-execution-carried-out/G7SeZpXuiEi329PcI3bj3g.cspx
Comment by Sons of Towel # November 11, 2009 at 5:10 pm
ding ding ding!!!
Comment by Towel # November 11, 2009 at 5:10 pm
“sonned”?
Comment by Towel # November 11, 2009 at 5:11 pm
You see, I think the interesting thing about “Snuggles’” so-called “argument” in comment 40 is that he was not there. I was actually there. “Snuggles”, actually admits to us that he is repeating his “story” based on hearsay. The other interesting thing about this “argument” is that if you know Josh Stewart, two things are prevalent about him. One, he is notorious for suggesting tricks to others. Maybe its because he can’t do them and that’s why he films. The other is that he has a notoriously faulty memory. So, if you would like your information presented to you based on hearsay, I’d suggest believing the load of shit presented in comment 40 as truth. That said, if you know me, you may have heard that I’m reasonably infamous for not taking to people to “my” spots and being a bit of a spot hoarder. It’s safe to say that you probably heard that for a reason. Let me make this clear, I did not want Nate, or anybody for that matter(especially not some lazy spot rapists) coming with us to film. I made the exception because Stewart happened to be babysitting Nate. It was either Nate comes or I don’t film my trick, on my spot, that I found. So know that you have all the accurate info, you make the call.
Comment by Towel # November 11, 2009 at 5:30 pm
And sorry if I’m not “down” to give up spots. Tell you what, you go out and find em and then you decide if you want to give them away. That’s not the way it works with me. So don’t be pissed if I don’t go “skate with you” or don’t act like your friend and then cry if you think I’m a dick. You want to give away spots, that’s your problem. If I see someone frothing at the mouth, I shut em down. Sorry about you. You think I buy this crock of bullshit?
Comment by Towel # November 11, 2009 at 5:35 pm
But let’s not let this interfere with that amazing sentence in paragraph 7, comment 50. Think about that, “Muhammad was pronounced dead at 9:11 p.m.”.
Comment by Towelizing # November 11, 2009 at 5:38 pm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad
Comment by Towelizing # November 11, 2009 at 5:38 pm
Seriously, it’s like I have to do twice the work with this shit. Not only do I have change your dirty diapers, I also have to wipe your fuckin shitty asses. My god people, get a fucking grasp here. “Wake Your Own Head”, why don’t you tell me what your beef is with me? I just sat here and explained where my beef with Stewart stems from. And that’s just the tip of the iceberg with this dude. You too Snuggles. then after your done, you can show us your credentials. You already know mine.
Comment by Towelizing # November 11, 2009 at 5:45 pm
Who’s sonned?
Comment by Towelizing # November 11, 2009 at 5:46 pm
“Hypocrisy”? Don’t make get into hypocrisy, cause I’ll make your head hurt and your eyes well up.
Comment by Towelizing # November 11, 2009 at 5:47 pm
Holy shit, you’re KIDDING me. Pronounced dead at 9:11pm? Holy sweet mother! That’s seriously ridiculous. This is like the fucking Illuminati template. Numerology 101. Playskools “My First Illuminati Ritual MK Ultra operation”. Wow.
Comment by Theorizer # November 11, 2009 at 5:50 pm
A.P., gotta love it! Read that shit today in the “newspaper”. Plain as day, got the clipping sitting right in front of me. The one I have actually says, “Muhammad was declared dead at 9:11 pm”
Comment by Towelizer # November 11, 2009 at 5:56 pm
No, but I’m just “losing my mind” and “delusional”. And I also willingly take people to my spots so they can spot rape them and I’m a dick if I’m not cool with that. I’m also a “hypocrite”. Right.
Comment by Towelizer # November 11, 2009 at 5:59 pm
You bitches need to start paying attention!
Comment by Towelizer # November 11, 2009 at 6:04 pm
OH, and just to get some records straight here, we didn’t go to said spot to film said Towel’s said trick. We had already filmed his tricks at that spot. We went there because I asked you to take us there because Nate might like the spot. Nate, for those of you who don’t know, got only 3 months to film his part for Static 3. After a trip to Europe with me, he had to go on an Adio trip during which he was hucked down some stairs and tore his ACL. So, he wasn’t able to film for the final 9 months of production of Static Trois. Then, as I was editing the video he begged to come back to NY for a last week of filming with me so he could hopefully get a few new things for his part.
But his confidence was really shaky, as anybody’s would be after coming off an injury for so long. So, after a week we had gotten nothing. Everything we went to felt a little too scary for him still. Then, on his LAST day in town, Bob agreed to show Nate the spot in question. So we went there. Nate skated around for a while. Bob sat and stared on, visibly unhappy about bringing us there. But Nate was desperate after nearly a year of not being able to film. It was his last day to film for Static 3. Then he started trying to ollie into the spot. I didn’t suggest he try it. That’s an absolute fabrication. Nate is incredibly talented and doesn’t need my help. He asked me if it would be good enough to film. All I said was that it would be better in a line with a flip trick in the street afterward. As soon as he did land the ollie (without me filming yet) Bob tripped out. He immediately stood in the the way and said “You guys can’t film here”. Plain and simple.
I actually asked you to not trip out that one time. Because Nate needed to get SOMEthing on his trip. His sponsors would need to see that he had tried to make his trip worth while and we needed more footage for his part. I figured that, as a friend, you would do us that one favor. After you’d travelled around the world with us, staying in the apartments I had rented for Static skaters to stay in, letting you stay with us for free, driving you around, and taking up space that another Static skater could’ve filled, that MAYBE you could return a fraction of the favor by not tripping out on one spot that Nate wasn’t even skating the same way you’d skated it. But of course, you couldn’t do that. And we sent Nate packing, with no footage. Not even allowed to film a trick he did right in front of all of our eyes.
You’re quite the friend.
Comment by Theorizer # November 11, 2009 at 6:07 pm
I have to admit, I never looked much into 9/11 “conspiracy theories” or theories of other U.S. tragedies other than JFK a little bit. I always had this preconceived idea that they had to be false for some reason. However, I would visit towel’s or Josh’s links under these comments every once in a while. I decided to view the last few links on here and I have to say it’s unsettling. Like I said, I haven’t done much research into these things but it seems like the “coincidences” are numerous and I’m understanding more why you believe in the “conspiracy theories”. Interesting Stuff.
Comment by Justin # November 11, 2009 at 6:44 pm
Good, you a smart nigga
Comment by God # November 11, 2009 at 7:10 pm
Also Towel, you mind saying what trick of Nick Jensen’s it was because I re-watched the London section and your part but Nick didn’t skate any of the same spots. Again, could you point out where this happened in static 3?
Comment by Justin # November 11, 2009 at 7:15 pm
You ladies are still missing my point. Puleo just went on a tirade about why he hates Theorizer. And he pointed out that it stems from an incident in which Puleo filmed a trick on a spot that others had already filmed on but he was hitting it in a new way. And, even though that spot was in another city, and another country, it was still permissable because he was hitting it differently.
So, if this is true, why would Nate get shut down for doing this very same thing? It’s clearly stated above that you consider that honorable behavior. You are trying to argue about my statement being “hearsay”, which it admitedly is. But, although Theorizer basically just confirmed this story for us, that’s not the point at all. It’s your anger over somebody doing to you what you did to the Brits in Static II and Moving In Traffic. This is why people on this site keep stating the obvious, Mr. Puleo, because you are indeed a hypocrite. You weasel your way out of everything in your own mind, when all the rest of us see it plain as can be, that you’re violating the very same rules you are reaming others for breaking. Tisk tisk, Snuggles does not approve. No snuggles for you. Ever.
Comment by Snuggles, the fabric softening bear # November 11, 2009 at 7:55 pm
Theorizer, your faulty memory comes back to bite you in the ass once more. First off, I didn’t say that I actually filmed my trick that day. I believe my trick was actually filmed after that. I decided to shut you guys down after you suggested to Nate that he try and ollie into the spot. Nate wasn’t “skating around” the spot and definitely wasn’t “trying it”. I remember it clear as day. He may have rode up to it once or twice, but he definitely wasn’t “trying it” and he sure as hell didn’t do it. For one, you have a notoriously faulty memory. Two, I would never “feed” Nate Broussard a spot. Everyone knows this about me. YOU even know this about me, probably better than anyone else. You’d be the first to admit it. So I’m gonna dismiss all this shit you’re making up in your head right now as CLASSIC Stewart Effect, and forget about it. It’s not a big deal anyhow. I didn’t even bring this one up. And like I said, if either of you had any balls, you woulda filmed it anyway. But you didn’t and that my friend proves your guilt to me. Granted, if you did it woulda made you a clas a dog. You didn’t even know what boro that spot is in. You prolly still don’t. If you thought it was abiding by the rules, then you woulda told me to go shove it. Besides, it’d been a different story if I wasn’t with you. Or if Nate found the spot on his own while creeping around. Yeah sure, Nate just came off an ACL injury and wasn’t doing much “filming”, but yet he had all the time in the world to disappear into the bars of the LES that “trip”. And reappear on days at 5 in the afternoon. Good one Stewart. So what your actually telling me is that it was you that thought of that spot for Nate and then asked me to take you there? That’s almost even worse. Come on Stewart, get a grip here bud. You’re absolutely tripping, I shut him down before he even started “trying” that. You think I’m stupid? You think I’d just allow you to take some out of towner to a spot that I toiled for, just to have some tool spot rape it? Your tripping. On top of that, plenty of your friends will testify to how terrible your memory is and how you make shit up and then pass it off as fact. It’s CLASSIC STEWART AND CLASSIC STEWART EFFECT. Good try Buddy. It ain’t gonna work this time neither. Isn’t it past your bedtime?
Comment by Towelizer # November 11, 2009 at 7:58 pm
67, Static 2, bench to bank in London. Static 3, Pat Steiner, Columbia ledge into bank. Word up Stewballs. Instead exploiting skateboarding for HBO, go try and actually find some spots for you and your tourista “friends” to film on. Besides, I can tell you some shit about your “friends” that’ll make your head spin. Oh yeah, and ollieing into that thing isn’t even really that sick anyway. Sorry bout you and Broussard.
Comment by Towelizer # November 11, 2009 at 8:05 pm
How’s that for some hate?
Comment by Towelizer # November 11, 2009 at 8:06 pm
What?
Comment by Towelizer # November 11, 2009 at 8:06 pm
68, “others”? as in plural? And for the 100th time, HE DID NOT SKATE IT THE WAY I SKATED IT. On top of that, I didn’t ask to go there. Plus I never saw his trick. Plus, I still have never seen his trick. And if you really want me to get savy, I’ve never even seen First Broadcast. I’ve never seen anything that BluePrint puts out except for that dope part that Shier put out a long time ago. You wanna know why? Cause I couldn’t give a fuck. What was Mark Channers trick in? And on top of that, who the hell is “Mark Channer”? Sorry to sound like a prick here, and maybe we’ve met, but who is he? Was he pro for BluePrint? Was he am? What was the trick in? Tell us? Tell me. I’ll go watch it and say, “Oh, awesome.” I mean seriously, what do you want me to say? I DID NOT BITE MARK CHANNERS TRICK THE SAME WAY PEOPLE BIT THE WAY I SKATED THAT THING. And you know how I know this? Because it took me flying across the fucking Atlantic Ocean to skate that thing like the way I did before every Tom, Dick and Harry was filming tricks on it. Like I said, that shit is in London on a main fucking street! If everyone saw Mark Channers trick on it, then tell me why no one skated it(supposedly the “easier” way) that I skated it until I skated it that way? What the fuck is wrong with you? Look, I know you’re butt hurt by having your shit bubble burst in front of everyone, but your social problems are not my fucking problems. And to further cement the point of my “tirade”, Stewart put Nick’s trick that was filmed after mine, before mine in his video. That’s what I was pissed about. What the fuck is so difficult to understand here? It’s not the same fucking thing! For one, even if I did see Mark Channers trick, his still came out before mine, correct? Don’t you see what I’m getting at here? God, it’s like your a fucking broken record player and I’m just about fucking sick of it. You’ve got to be fucking kidding me.
Comment by Towelizer # November 11, 2009 at 8:24 pm
“what you did to the Brits in Static II and Moving In Traffic” -Smuggles Yeah right! HAAA!!!!!!!
Comment by Towelizer # November 11, 2009 at 8:26 pm
Seriously, you’ve got to be kidding me. You’re argument is breaking down before your very eyes. I know that shit sucks. Throw it back in the wash on warm. Maybe try a faster cycle?
Comment by Towelizer # November 11, 2009 at 8:27 pm
Should I take this opportunity to point out Snowy kickflipping that bump to bar that I skated in MIT? Which I thought was super sick by the way. Funny, you didn’t mention that in your “argument”.
Comment by Towelizer # November 11, 2009 at 8:29 pm
You might as while stop while your “ahead”.
Comment by Towel Your Own Head # November 11, 2009 at 8:30 pm
Look homey, my point is solid, and this why you don’t see Stewart rushing to defend his decision to put the tricks where they went in his video’s. For one he’s oblivious to most shit. Two he’s a sneaky and manipulative, little fucker. I’ll give him that. It makes for a nice video. But on top of that, he’s got a raw guilty conscience. He knows what he does, and this is why he employs The Stewart Effect so much to distract you. This is why instead of defending his decisions, he went with the Nate Broussard thing instead. I know it, and he knows it. It’s as plain as day. In fact he rarely addresses most of the things I bring up. Instead he rolls out his straw men and tears them to shreds in front of everybody. He hasn’t addressed any of the shit I brought up in comment 29, and you won’t see him anytime soon. HE KNOWS WHAT HE DOES. It’s actually quite amazing. He actually knows what he does and at the same time he doesn’t because he doesn’t think shit through before he does stuff. I can point out so much personal shit in this instance, but this is not the time or the place. He actually does shit and then makes up shit to fuel excuses as to why he did it. He’s fucking notorious for it. I’ve seen him do it a thousand times. All you people only get to see Josh Stewart “underground/Independent film maker”. But I get to see Josh Stewart, notorious talker and back peddler. Don’t get me wrong, I like Josh and I’ve gone out of my way to accommodate him into my scene and my city. But when I see the type of shit that he sometimes puts up on this website, the type of shit he’s one to me and his “friends” in the past and the level of hypocrisy this dude employs, I feel like it’s my responsibility to keep this shit clean and call bullshit when I see bullshit. So all you people can call me names or say I’m hated or whatever, but rest assured, Josh Stewart knows what the fuck I’m talking about. And that’s all I care about. He knows what I’m talking about and his guilt fucking bleeds when I see him. It really actually sucks to witness and to be around. Have a good night.
Comment by Towel One # November 11, 2009 at 8:55 pm
I meant the type of shit he’s “done” to me and his “friends”
Comment by Towel One # November 11, 2009 at 8:57 pm
“He immediately stood in the the way and said “You guys can’t film here”. Plain and simple.” Do you really expect people to believe I would actually do something like that? You’re absolutely tripping out. Classic Stewart shit. That is so absolutely unlike me it is ridiculous. In fact I can’t even believe the scenario you just cooked up inside that cop haircut head of yours. Too much gel on that wig Stewart. It’s creepin into that brain of yours. Or lack there of. Besides, you people can bitch and moan about what I say on here, but you know what, this is actually helping me get over this petty bullshit. I actually feel like I’m purging myself of some of the feelings I have about this stuff. But it’s gonna take me a long time to get over some of the stuff that went down. Some of that shit really hurt me. I really feel like you stepped on my toes for your own benefit and not for “our” benefit. Like you try and guilt me on the “Static apartment” bullshit, like how you use the word “us”. But both of “us” know, the apartment shit was for both of our benefits. The spot stabbing was for your own benefit and you know it. You admit it. There was no way I was benefiting from any of that shit and you know that. In fact, that shit made me resent you, so go figure. Regardless Stewart, I saw what kind of person you are and it makes me sick. It still makes me sick to look at you. But that said, I’m trying to get over it. This unfortunately, is part of the process. And just for the record, Nate absolutely did not ollie into that thing. He definitely whiffed at it, and no doubt, I’m sure he could do it. But so what? It was on principal that he absolutely should not have done it and that I suppose, is how the story goes. Believe me, Nate got something that trip Stewart. No hard feelings. Have a good night.
Comment by Towel One # November 11, 2009 at 10:38 pm
‘it would be better in a line with a flip trick in the street afterward.’
NO! This is exactly why the overwhelming majority of skate videos these days suck. Nate Broussard is a pleasure to watch on video but I’ll be goddamned if I don’t hate the sight of someone like him doing something like the following: wallie, flatground whatever, kind-of-fake push (arms floating around everywhere), last trick on an urban spot. BARF!!!!!!!!!! BBBBBBBAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! If someone doesn’t hate this kind of shit then I think I believe they simply lack perception. You are not sick or creative or thoughtful if you do three contrived bullshit tricks in a row in a city.
Comment by Seabreeze # November 11, 2009 at 11:56 pm
Man…I really miss you guys. Whenever i check in on this site, it’s like we never parted ways. Just like old times…the salad days.
Comment by Frank Black # November 12, 2009 at 6:40 am
Nate did the ollie. Why would I make that up?
The dude is a horse, how is that even in question? Dude ollied over the entire spot you did a noseblunt on and landed into the cellar door. Your pride was in jeopardy because dude dwarfed your spot.
And yes, you walked straight toward me as I was setting up my camera and said “You guys can’t film here”. You didn’t block Nate from trying it, but you were standing at the bottom of the spot and just shut it down.
We didn’t go back because these skaters all have respect. And even after you’d dogged them out were still respecting your wishes.
The Stiener/Columbia shit is a whole other can of wax. Should we start that chapter? Let’s just go through our entire history together and discuss it in front of the entire world! Sounds Awesome! Free therapy session!
Comment by Theorizer # November 12, 2009 at 9:05 am
The best part of all of this is I have to work with The Towel in 2 hours. Am I living in the Twilight Zone?
Comment by Theorizer # November 12, 2009 at 9:05 am
How about you just close the chapters on this one. Torres skated that spot first anyways
Comment by TongueBath # November 12, 2009 at 10:01 am
Maybe if you pussy’s just steped your tricks up you wouldnt have to cry about who skates your spots.
Comment by Gangsta # November 12, 2009 at 10:10 am
I feel like im a girls locker room when i read this shit.
Comment by Gangsta # November 12, 2009 at 10:11 am
Why can’t we just skate without the social bull shit
Comment by Gangsta # November 12, 2009 at 10:13 am
A Twilight Zone of your own making, Josh.
Comment by Wanksta # November 12, 2009 at 10:14 am
http://www.cutebabies.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/crying_baby.jpg
Comment by Gangsta # November 12, 2009 at 10:16 am
Josh, i did it first!!!!! *sniff sniff* you put nates tirck before me what a meanie
Comment by Gangsta # November 12, 2009 at 10:16 am
I’m the only reason your bitch ass board even gets sold at the biggest skateshop in america.
Comment by Twilight this # November 12, 2009 at 10:30 am
Uhh…wha?
Comment by Wanksta # November 12, 2009 at 10:38 am
I think its pretty easy to understand Towel’s points. The dude makes his living off of skateboarding and he has made a name for himself as “spot seeker” type of skater. He skates spots that no one has ever seen and skates them in ways no one else does. Fuck, if i made my money off of skating and some douche was running through my town, trying to skate “my” spots, id be pissed as well. I mean, i dont even film but i still dont give my spots away. I could only imagine if i had to live off of it.
#86, its not about the trick. Towel has explained it before. Its a stolen aesthetic/spot rape that is the problem. Ive seen that spot a few times (#85, Torres was not the first, sorry) and everytime i see it, i say to myself, “self, thats a bobby spot”, because he was the first. It doesnt matter what trick is done, it will still always resonate as bobby’s spot.
That said, Theo, when do you want to go film some tricks at all of Bobby’s spots? I have a serious youtube account that needs some vid’s!!(rofl rofl rofl)
Comment by Jura # November 12, 2009 at 10:50 am
Is Wanksta the Towel and was comment 89 directed at me?
Comment by Gangsta # November 12, 2009 at 10:51 am
Jura you might as well just pull down Bobbys cute little brown cords and feast away
Comment by TongueBath # November 12, 2009 at 10:54 am
“(rofl rofl rofl)”
Comment by TongueBath # November 12, 2009 at 11:30 am
Yeah jerk! Bobby has so many spots. He finds them all by himself when he’s driving around in his car. He’s so independent and creative. He’s the best.
Comment by booker t # November 12, 2009 at 11:42 am
Yea, I should def blow him simply because what he says makes sense. Im so gay.
Comment by Jura # November 12, 2009 at 11:57 am
Gangster . what is it that bobby did that made you hate him so much?, Just wondering ..
Comment by original gangster # November 12, 2009 at 12:57 pm
puleo is the tops
Comment by fear of a black towel # November 12, 2009 at 2:05 pm
Probably blacklisted him from Mt. Weather a few years back.
Or, is Gangsta actually Theorizer???
Is Towel actually Wanksta???
Does PennyPacker really have a “girlfriend”???
Do you fucks really care that much???
Stay tuned…
Comment by Wanksta # November 12, 2009 at 2:58 pm
apparently you do
Comment by tonguebath # November 12, 2009 at 4:46 pm
When i visit this website i get this http://i37.tinypic.com/10or79i.jpg
Comment by Turn that pussy from pink to red # November 12, 2009 at 8:02 pm
Ouch
Comment by Gangsta shit # November 12, 2009 at 8:03 pm
A dog that think’s he is a wash rag.
Comment by Gangsta shit # November 12, 2009 at 8:03 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZvCP25ka3E
Comment by Snuggles, the fabric softening bear # November 12, 2009 at 8:05 pm
And is a social nightmare gone wrong who “think’s” “think’s” thinks he is god.
Comment by Gangsta shit # November 12, 2009 at 8:05 pm
http://video.mpora.com/watch/iYT9QYqXW/
Comment by Bob Sackamano # November 13, 2009 at 12:36 pm
so where is the 50 50 everyone is talking about he did ?
Comment by original gangster # November 13, 2009 at 12:58 pm
This is some entertaining shit. I’m going to have to agree with Towel if all the things about Broussard are true. If his sponsors paid for him to come out there for a week, the final week of filming for the video, and he fucked off at the bar every night, sorry ’bout him. As a last resort to ask Puleo if they could go to his spot (am I remembering that correctly?) to try and film something when the spot hadn’t been blown up yet is kinda wack. If I am thinking of the correct spot, the two stair grinder into the cellar door, an ollie really ain’t that cool anyways. I watched a 5′5″ little kid do that shit, no joke. It just seems kinda pointless to pester Bobby like that.
Then again, If I flew some dickhole halfway around the world, drove him around, and gave him a place to stay, I’d feel a little entitled to a small favor like take me to a single spot for one guy to film one trick on for my video that is coming out after this last day of filming. He ain’t asking for your spot handbook, Towel. Then again, I’m sure you have showed Theorizer more than a spot or two.. Quite the pickle.
Comment by Psyched Floridian # November 13, 2009 at 1:56 pm
“dickhole”
Comment by tonguebath # November 13, 2009 at 2:38 pm
Psyched one…..did you read the part where I explained that Nate was fresh off an ACL surgery and that he tried to skate several spots but his confidence wasn’t strong enough yet?
And an ollie over that whole spot into the cellar door is actually rather tight. Did ur little munckikin friend ollie into it or out of it like a fatty to flatty?
Did you just say “pickle” and “dickhole” in the same paragraph?
Comment by Theorizer # November 13, 2009 at 5:23 pm
Wait, who was the dude who ollied into the door? Was it Kevin Tierney? Whoever it was, if he was actually 5′5″ then the thought of Nate Broussard going to bars every night and someone taking him there and him almost filming one of those pre-packaged flip-trick-then-urban-ollie lines is… Wait, I lost my train of thought because all I can hear are dogs barking in my head.
https://www.storesonlinepro.com/files/1586691/uploaded/Big%20Dog.jpg
Hahahahahahaha
Comment by Seabreeze # November 13, 2009 at 6:03 pm
http://www.storybroads.com/uploaded_images/IMG_3466-769473.JPG
Comment by Wino # November 13, 2009 at 6:09 pm
BLOGGING ON THEORIES OF ATLANTIS:101……..
-Rule #1: When in doubt of what to say, get super wacky and creative and post an image of a dog.
-Rule #2: If you have no idea what’s going on, it’s probably safe to just post an image of some sort of canine creature, possibly in some precarious situation with it’s silly suburbanite owner.
-Rule #3: If the Towel’s taint is blocking your vision of the screen, just resort to your cache of dog image links and post at will.
-Rule #4: If you have no valid opinion in an argument, you weren’t there, and you really have no clue what’s going on, pull a hilarious dog photo out of the bag of dog photos you keep stored in your ass and link the shit out of that thing.
-Rule #5: Take all comments left by any blogger with a witty twist on the word “Towel” in his name and consider it as the spoken word of god. Worship it, lick it, hold it in your teeth like a happy dog and violently shake it back and forth until you see stars, set it upon an altar and bow to it like a karate student would his sensei, masturbate in, on and around it, attach it to a rope and run it up the nearest flag pole, write your own emotional pledge of allegience to it and recite the words while standing naked on your skateboard crying. Pack some of it into some rolling papers and smoke it. Take deep breaths and feel it tickling your lungs like a million tiny unwashed beard hairs, then exhale slowly and spell out the word “Towel” in the smoke. Take a tiny tissue sample of it, put it in a petri dish, spin it in a centrifuge next to some uranium and make a clone out of it. Raise it like it’s your own child until it’s at a ripe age and the rape it like you do that old t-shirt you keep next to the stack of gay porn under your bed
Comment by Theorizer # November 13, 2009 at 7:48 pm
worst comment ever ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Comment by ha # November 13, 2009 at 8:34 pm
Uh, are you talking to me? It was actually Psyched Floridian’s latest comment that swayed me. What part of his interpretation of things would you take issue with anyway? Because if what he wrote is at all accurate, then
http://www.hoax-slayer.com/images/worlds-strongest-dog.jpg
Oh, and Shawn Powers is the dude who did the ollie into the cellar door:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AuETtaNWdRU
When I compare how sick this little dude’s full speed ollie into it is to how sick Nate Broussard’s mellow ‘horse’ (to use your term) ollie (after a Texas-sized nollie flip and some kosher-as-fuck urban pushes, all thanks to you Spielberg) might have been, I am glad things happened like they did. Fuck your buddy’s sponsors and video part anyway; I’d rather watch a local ripper do it for sure.
Finally, I would absolutely love to know if Nate Broussard happened to have stopped by Max Fisch while he was in New York that trip. Hahahahahahahahahahaha
Comment by Seabreeze # November 13, 2009 at 8:47 pm
Yeah Seabreeze, you were a regular posterboy of sobriety and shreddom last time I saw you weren’t you?
Pot? kettle? black?…..anyone?
Comment by Theorizer # November 13, 2009 at 8:49 pm
http://lvillage.education.vic.gov.au/lv/diec/hp.nsf/Files/chrissywaterfall/$File/dog+and+horse.jpg
Comment by Wino # November 13, 2009 at 9:09 pm
http://www.danish-design-pet-products.com/images/royal-stewart-tarton.jpg
Comment by horsedog # November 13, 2009 at 9:42 pm
http://media.photobucket.com/image/horsedog/mugatu123/horsedog.jpg
Comment by Wino # November 13, 2009 at 9:45 pm
Peep my words: No, dummy, this would be a case of the pot calling the kettle black if I depended on others to sustain my fake ass skateboarding career, even as I laughed at others for doing so. But as you know, I have no skate career, and as you might not know, I have never depended on anyone but myself to find shit to film. (Not saying the results were good, but I can safely claim this.) Anyway, after I saw you last I took the subway into midtown and then pushed back to the big homey’s spot in BK. It was exactly what I felt like doing, and it was lovely. And drinking is kosher as all hell as far as I’m concerned, but if you can’t spot the doggery in a visiting professional skater getting wasted at Max Fisch when he’s not being taken to spots, then god help you.
So did he go to Max Fisch or what?
Comment by Seabreeze # November 13, 2009 at 9:47 pm
I think they ended up engraving his name in one of the stools.
Comment by Theorizer # November 13, 2009 at 10:06 pm
I’m late on this one (sorry, I’ve been trying to get a job), so who knows if the people in question will get to see this or feel like responding but…
TOWEL: You know in Static 3 when you did a flatground flip trick, then ollied up a little wedge, over some stairs into another little wedge? I believe it was the first footage of you in said video…
Well how about the fact Alex Olsen (who I’m sure could be considered to display all sorts of “dog” behavior) did the same trick, minus the flatground fliptrick to make it a “line”, and yes I know he came from the other direction, in a video long before Static 3?
Did you (or Theorizer) not know about this being in a New York based video, some three years or so before Static 3 came out? Based on the shoe choice in said video, I’m certain you didn’t film it first…
And while this is not directly what everyone is talking about here I’m interested to know your thoughts on it, as it seems to be a stark contradiction to the “rules” you preach you skate by? And I was always curious about it. When I saw the line, and the trick, and the reference, for the first time at the Static 3 premiere, I was shocked and kind of bummed out that you would film it in the first place.
And we can’t use the Theorizer chose to put it in the video, not me excuse. Because you chose to film it too.
And you really need to quit it regarding the whole London spot thing. Your coming across like a lunatic. It’s a whole other city, a whole other country, you clearly know nothing about. Based on the fact you have no interest in watching any videos that come out of there, or claim not to care about the hearsay concerning the tricks and spots there. In which case: how can you know who’s done what where? How can you honestly think you were the first guy EVER to skate a spot there a certain way? Especially a spot you agree is right in the middle of a busy street. The fact is: who knows how many joe-hero’s skated that thing, with or without a filmer, that no one has ever seen. Sure claiming firsts on spots in cities you live in, and know everything about, is one thing, but one that’s thousands of miles away that you were visiting and being shown around? Get the fuck out of here.
And I’ll see if I can track down that Channer clip for you some time.
The way you approach your skating is certainly admirable, but it’s clear from some of the stuff that’s been posted on here by you and others over the last few weeks, that you don’t always stick to the rules that you yourself set forth. Which is no big deal, honestly, if only you’d stop going on rants about it every five seconds and making such a fool of yourself.
Online or otherwise.
Comment by UptonSinclair # November 16, 2009 at 1:11 pm
Upton I’m pretty sure you haven’t been skating for that long. Bobby had a forties ad backside ollieng that spot before Alex Olson was even skating.
Comment by tonguebath # November 16, 2009 at 2:46 pm
Don’t quote me on that, but i’m pretty sure….
Comment by tonguebath # November 16, 2009 at 2:53 pm
Yeah good call on that but my reference points are two video parts not the Forties ad, which I have never seen but would love to. Sorry to upset you but not having seen that ad is no connection to the length of time I’ve been skating, which is since around 97 if that matters at all. Still I’m curious about the trick and the filming of it regardless… If he did do it backside some 10 years before for a Forties ad then I might let it slide. But damn if he wouldn’t be flogging that horse…
Comment by UptonSinclair # November 16, 2009 at 5:27 pm
Yeah, it was definitely a Forties ad (that came out around 2001). I’ve also seen footage of it, but tha god wasn’t feeling it for some reason. I feel that it’s also worth pointing out that the one other spot that Alex skated in the video you’re referring to (Lurkers II) was also first skated by the Towel.
But I don’t mean to beat up on Alex. After all, he did give us all this:
http://pypeople.wordpress.com/2009/05/12/cat-face/
Comment by Seabreeze # November 16, 2009 at 6:14 pm
Did anyone see that interview online with him and some girl? asking him the worst shit ever? he should have the universe beat up on him for that.
Comment by Wino # November 16, 2009 at 8:29 pm
bobby as amazing as everythings ever been that youve put out, to say your livelihood comes from skating must be a falsehood. when was the last time you had a foto ran or have ever made it known that you stilll care about skating. all in all shit is pretty trivial in the grand scheme of things, and it makes me thing your pretty out of touch if you cant recognize the natural wonder of style that is broussard. and at least homie gets coverage. im sure any fotographer would love to go out and shoot stuff of you so whats the issue? you get so damn critical of everything and fun gets extracted and you end up trapped in thoughts and your head. the longer you stay distant and removed from skatings eye, the less credibility you have and more you just seem like a bitter old man. which is understandable as most east coast og’s have been given the shit end of the stick but then do something about it. stewart just needs to keep puttin out statics and the like and that keeps his legitmacy intact, as aside from squabbling, good styles and a variation in spots and locations and with lesser known skaters makes for a good video. so the fuck what if dude has to film redbull shit or whatever random stuff, its not like hes getting paid to have a swoosh on his forehead. regardlesss of it all, cant you and ricky just film some stuff on the weekends and put out some stuff of photos? thats the base of it all is that we just wanna see you guys skate and like pop’s said its too much to know all the personalities and bullshit behind the scenes. you guys are best friends and bicker, all friends do that. lets just get on with what you guys are known for and should be doing, skating and putting out rad videos giving light to new peopel and places. puleo get on your shit again and get on lakai or some shit, skaetr owned without any issue of honor and just rip fool! do more fakie varial flips, shit was sick. in conclusion, do whatever you guys want i aint no body to say nothin but please make some effort to inspire the next, i dont want to have to explain why people in brown pants skating “different” spots arent original, because they are original, but it would be good to be able to point to a foto of you or ricky and say “just know your roots” thats all. you guys just want credit right? so get it out there that you guys still run tings. especially if i was in yalls positioin and see every asshole take a trip to newyork and get some shit on some steps and skellardoor, the best thing for you to do is get coverage and then that shit would fly cause everyone would see it. you cant excpect the masses to know the past and be well educated, skating is has gotten so big that it too now has a mass population of uninformed headless chickens aka the 80 percent son. so show them whatsup and get back up in this shit, im pretty sure we all waitin for you to come back and educate son. people aint just gonna hand you that proshoe, especially now, you best get on it and get people siked
Comment by phillystep # December 4, 2009 at 12:36 pm